In Mona Aggarwal v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
Crl. M. No.13431-M of 2010
Date of Decision:25.10.2010
Mona Aggarwal
.... Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer
.... Respondent
CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present: Mr. V.K. Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner.None for the respondent.
****
1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed tosee the judgment?
2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral)
The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.for quashing the complaint No.102A dated 25.1.2010 (P-1) and order ofsummoning dated 25.1.2010 (P-2).
Written request for an adjournment has been filed by learnedcounsel for the respondent. It is stated by the learned counsel for thepetitioner that he was not informed of the said written request. However,he has fairly stated that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petitionwith liberty to raise all the requisite pleas before the trial Court. He alsoprays that the trial Court may be directed to decide the complaintexpeditiously.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.
( NIRMALJIT KAUR )JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.