Case LawHigh Court › Mona Aggarwal v. Income Tax Officer

Mona Aggarwal v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 25 Oct 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Mona Aggarwal v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
25 Oct 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mona Aggarwal v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.13431-M of 2010 Date of Decision:25.10.2010 Mona Aggarwal .... Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. V.K. Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner.None for the respondent. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed tosee the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.for quashing the complaint No.102A dated 25.1.2010 (P-1) and order ofsummoning dated 25.1.2010 (P-2). Written request for an adjournment has been filed by learnedcounsel for the respondent. It is stated by the learned counsel for thepetitioner that he was not informed of the said written request. However,he has fairly stated that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petitionwith liberty to raise all the requisite pleas before the trial Court. He alsoprays that the trial Court may be directed to decide the complaintexpeditiously. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. ( NIRMALJIT KAUR )JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan