Case LawHigh Court › Moores Road, Thousand Lights,Chennai – 6...

Moores Road, Thousand Lights,Chennai – 600 006 v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Company Circle I(3), Chennai – 600 034

High Court 14 Nov 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Moores Road, Thousand Lights,Chennai – 600 006 v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Company Circle I(3), Chennai – 600 034
Date of order
14 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Moores Road, Thousand Lights,Chennai – 600 006 v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Company Circle I(3), Chennai – 600 034, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

T.C.A.No.426 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14.11.2024 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGANT.C.A.No.426 of 2011& M.P.No.1 of 2011 M/s. Coastal Energy Pvt Ltd., 5 Buhari Buildings, Moores Road, Thousand Lights,Chennai – 600 006. .. Appellant vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Company Circle I(3), Chennai – 600 034. .. Respondent Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'B' Bench, Chennai dated 13.07.2011 in I.T.A.No.2099/Mds/2010. For Appellant :Mr.R.Venkatanarayananfor M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar PadmanabanFor Respondent:No appearance JUDGMENT (Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J) This is a matter relating to an order passed under the Income Tax Act, 1961, for assessment year (AY) 2006-07. 2.There is no appearance for the respondent. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4 T.C.A.No.426 of 2011 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner reports no instructions but states that, as noticed from the portal, the assessee company was the subject matter of proceedings before the National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai (NCLT) in IA/81/CHE/2021 in IBA/624/2019 along with IA/318/CHE/2021 in IBA/624/2019. Vide order dated 27.08.2021, the NCLT has allowed the aforesaid applications and has appointed a liquidator. 4.We are unaware of the status of the proceedings before the NCLT. Since three years have elapsed, it is expected that necessary claims would have been filed by the Income Tax Department before the liquidator. It is hence unnecessary for us to keep this Tax Case (Appeal) pending any further. 5.Recording the above, this Tax Case Appeal is closed returning the substantial questions of law unanswered. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index:Yes/NoSpeaking orderNeutral Citation:Yesvs [A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J] 14.11.2024 To The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Company Circle I(3), Chennai – 600 034. 3/4 T.C.A.No.426 of 2011 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4 T.C.A.No.426 of 2011 DR. ANITA SUMANTH.,J.andG. ARUL MURUGAN.,J. vs T.C.A.No.426 of 2011 14.11.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan