Case LawHigh Court › Mp/6739/2019 Of Principal Commissioner O...

Mp/6739/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sharad Vinodiya

High Court 26 Sep 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Mp/6739/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sharad Vinodiya
Date of order
26 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Mp/6739/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sharad Vinodiya, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The petition fails and is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWALON THE 26[th] OF SEPTEMBER, 2023 MISC. PETITION No. 6739 of 2019 BETWEEN:- PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXTHROUGH INCOME TAX OFFICER 2ND FLOOR,CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING NAPIER TOWN,JABALPUR, M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH) (BY SHRI SIDDHARTH SHARMA - ADVOCATE) .....PETITIONER AND SHARAD VINODIYA S/O LATE SHRI BASANT VINODIYA,AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O C/O THAKUR MAHENDRASINGH H.NO. 188/2, NEW SHOBHAPUR COLONY,JABALPUR, M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH) (BY SHRI SOMI CHOURASIYA - ADVOCATE) .....RESPONDENTS This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed thefollowing: ORDER This petition is filed against the order dated 22.11.2019 (Annexure P-6)passed by learned 6th Civil Judge, Class - I, Jabalpur in MJC No.818 of 2019. Shri Somi Chourasiya submits that the proceeding before the trial Courtin MJC have come to an end. In support of this contention, he has enclosed theorder dated 23.11.2022 whereby it reveals that the proceedings before the trialCourt have come to an end. In view of such fact that proceeding in MJC No.818 of 2019 have beenclosed, the petition against interlocutory order is not maintainable. Shri Siddharth Sharma submits that he is not having official instructions but at thesame he has no material to dispute the documents which have been filed by therespondent herein. He, however, on the basis of the online case status, admitsthat the proceedings have come to an end before the 6th Civil Judge, Class - I,Jabalpur. Therefore nothing survives for further adjudication in this petition. The petition fails and is dismissed. Accordingly, contempt notices are also disposed of and rule nisi isdischarged. ks (VIVEK AGARWAL)JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan