Mr. Abhimanyu Chopra, Advocates v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
22 Apr 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Mr. Abhimanyu Chopra, Advocates v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
22 Apr 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Mr. Abhimanyu Chopra, Advocates v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: The present petition is disposed of as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~03
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 2982/2020 & C.M. Nos.10342-44/2020
M/S. BT INDIA PRIVATE LTD. .... Petitioner Through Mr. Deepak Chopra Through Mr. Deepak Chopra
and
Mr. Abhimanyu Chopra, Advocates.
Versus
%
INCOME TAX OFFICER
..... Respondent
Through Mr. Sunil Agarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Tushar Gupta, Advocate.
CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD O R D E R22.04.2020
1. The matter has been heard through Video Conferencing.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that due to bona fide inadvertence, two petitions for the same relief for the relevant Assessment Year have been filed. He seeks leave to withdraw the present petition while reserving the right of the petitioner to press W.P. (C) 2984/2020.
3. Leave as prayed for is granted. The present petition is disposed of as not pressed.
HIMA KOHLI, J
APRIL 22, 2020 NA
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue