Case Law › High Court › Mr. Ajit Ku.roy, Advocate v. Opp. Partie...

Mr. Ajit Ku.roy, Advocate v. Opp. Parties

High Court 04 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

04 Mar 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr. Ajit Ku.roy, Advocate v. Opp. Parties, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Order No. 04. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ITA No. 49 of 2015 Rajeswar Thakur Petitioner …. Mr. Ajit Ku.Roy, Advocate -versus- Opp. Parties Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Sambalpur and others …. Mr. T.K. Satpathy, Sr. Standing Counsel CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK ORDER04.03.20221. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice ( R.K.Pattanaik) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.