Case Law › High Court › Mr. B. Panda, Advocate v. The Income Tax...

Mr. B. Panda, Advocate v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Bhubaneswar And Another

High Court 10 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

10 Mar 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Mr. B. Panda, Advocate v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Bhubaneswar And Another, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: No.30 of 2005 by this Court, this appeal is also disposed of in the same terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Order No. 04. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK I.T.A. No.106 of 2017 Mr. Pradeep Kumar Prusty …. Appellant Mr. B. Panda, Advocate -versus- Respondent The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Bhubaneswar and another …. Mr. T.K. Satpathy, Sr. Standing Counsel CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK ORDER 10.03.2022 In view of the order dated 10[th] April 2019 passed in I.T.A. No.30 of 2005 by this Court, this appeal is also disposed of in the same terms. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge KC Bisoi

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.