Case Law › High Court › Mr. B. Panda, Advocate v. The Income Tax...

Mr. B. Panda, Advocate v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Sambalpur

High Court 07 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

07 Feb 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Mr. B. Panda, Advocate v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Sambalpur, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Order No. 04. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ITA No.66 of 2009 …. Appellant Naba Kishore Das Mr. B. Panda, Advocate -versus- …. Respondent The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Sambalpur Mr. S.S. Mohaptra, SC, Income Tax CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER 07.02.2022 1. Learned counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file other appropriate proceedings to challenge the impugned order. 2. The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge T.TUDU

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.