Case Law › High Court › Mr. B. Panda, Advocate v. The Income Tax...

Mr. B. Panda, Advocate v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-I(I), Bhubaneswar And Another

High Court 09 Mar 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

09 Mar 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Mr. B. Panda, Advocate v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-I(I), Bhubaneswar And Another, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Order No. 04. Tudu/Kabita IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ITA No.107 of 2017 …. Ashok Kumar Patra Appellant Mr. B. Panda, Advocate -versus- …. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-I(I), Bhubaneswar and another Respondents Mr. T.K. Satpathy, Sr. S.C. (IT) CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK ORDER 09.03.2022 1. Considering the insubstantial amount of penalty imposed on the Assessee, the Court is of the view that no substantial question of law arises in the present appeal of the Assessee. 2. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice ( R.K.Pattanaik) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.