Case Law › High Court › Mr. B. Panda, Senior Advocate v. The Inc...

Mr. B. Panda, Senior Advocate v. The Income Tax Officer, (Exemptions), Berhampur And Others

High Court 29 Mar 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

29 Mar 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr. B. Panda, Senior Advocate v. The Income Tax Officer, (Exemptions), Berhampur And Others, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Order No. 02. ITA No.161 of 2018 ….M/s. Swasthya Bikash Samittee Appellant Mr. B. Panda, Senior Advocate -versus- ….Respondents The Income Tax officer, (Exemptions), Berhampur and others Mr. Radheshyam Chimanka, Senior Standing counsel along with Mr. A. Kedia, Junior Standing Counsel for Revenue Department CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK ORDER 29.03.2022 I. A. No.48 of 2018 and ITA No.161 of 2018 1. There is a delay of 379 days in filing this appeal. The explanation offered in para 2 of the above interlocutory application is that the officials of the Institution got engaged before the Medical Council of India for renewal of permission for admission of the 3[rd] Batch of MBBS students for the Academic year 2018-19. 2. This by no means would have prevented the Appellant from preparing and filing the present appeal within time. The explanation offered is not convincing at all. Consequently, the Court is not inclined to condone the delay in filing the appeal. I.A. No.48 of 2018 is accordingly dismissed. Consequently, ITA No.161 of 2018 is dismissed. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R. K. Pattanaik) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.