Case Law › High Court › Mr. Balmukand P. Acharaya v. Commissione...

Mr. Balmukand P. Acharaya v. Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Xviii

High Court 20 Oct 2011 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

20 Oct 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Mr. Balmukand P. Acharaya v. Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Xviii, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

k IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1568 OF 2011 ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6425 OF 2010 Mr. Balmukand P. Acharaya Vs.Commissioner of Income Tax City-XVIII .. Appellant .. Respondent. Mr. Aarti Sathe for the appellant.Mr. D.K. Kamwal for the respondent. CORAM: J.P. DEVADHAR & K.K. TATED, JJ.DATE: 20TH OCTOBER, 2011. P.C. By consent, Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment be carried out within two weeks. Chamber Summons is accordingly disposed of. (K.K. TATED, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.