Mr. Bijay Panda, Advocate v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward -2(1), ….Sambalpur And Another Opposite Parties
High Court
20 Feb 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Mr. Bijay Panda, Advocate v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward -2(1), ….Sambalpur And Another Opposite Parties
Date of order
20 Feb 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Mr. Bijay Panda, Advocate v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward -2(1), ….Sambalpur And Another Opposite Parties, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is allowed, but in the circumstances, with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.3899 of 2023
Shankar Lal Agrawala
….
Petitioner
Mr. Bijay Panda, Advocate
-versus-
The Income Tax Officer, Ward -2(1), ….Sambalpur and Another Opposite Parties
Mr. Sidharth Shankar Mohapatra, Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Departmentfor Income Tax Department
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M. S. RAMAN
ORDER
20.02.2023
Order No.
01.
1. The Court has been shown a copy of the order dated 20th January, 2023 passed by the Supreme Court of India in SLP (C) Diary No.39003 of 2022 (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Sambalpur v. Om Prakash Poddar), which is a Department’s SLP against the order dated 14th March, 20222 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.5818 of 2022. The Court notes, however, that no stay has been granted of such order of this Court. January, 2023 passed by the Supreme Court of India in SLP (C) Diary No.39003 of 2022 (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Sambalpur v. Om Prakash Poddar), which is a Department’s SLP against the order dated 14th March, 20222 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.5818 of 2022. The Court notes, however, that no stay has been granted of such order of this Court.
2. Following the order dated 14th March, 20222 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.5818 of 2022, the impugned notice and all Page 2 of 2 consequential orders and steps taken thereunder hereby stand quashed. Court in W.P.(C) No.5818 of 2022, the impugned notice and all Page 2 of 2 consequential orders and steps taken thereunder hereby stand quashed.
3. The writ petition is allowed, but in the circumstances, with no order as to costs.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(M. S. Raman)
Judge
MRS/Basudev
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.