Case Law › High Court › Mr. B.p. Das, Advocate v. Assistant Comm...

Mr. B.p. Das, Advocate v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle Tds, Bhubaneswar And Others

High Court 22 Dec 2023 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

22 Dec 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Mr. B.p. Das, Advocate v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle Tds, Bhubaneswar And Others, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Decision: In view of the common judgment passed today in W.P.(C) No.35140 of 2021, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitally SignedSigned by: BHABAGRAHI JHANKARDesignation: Assistant Registrar-cum-Senior SecretaryReason: AuthenticationLocation: ORISSA HIGH COUIRT, CUTTACKDate: 07-Mar-2024 17:08:45 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No’s. 30312 of 2021 …. M/s. Oriclean Private Limited, Cuttack Petitioner (s) Mr. B.P. Das, Advocate -versus- …. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle TDS, Bhubaneswar and others Opp. Party(s) Mr. S.S. Mohapatra, Sr. SC for Income Tax Department CORAM: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI MR JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY ORDER22.12.2023 Order No. 8. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. In view of the common judgment passed today in W.P.(C) No.35140 of 2021, this Writ Petition is disposed of. (Dr. S.K.Panigrahi) Judge (G. Satapathy) Judge B. Jhankar

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.