Mr. C. Parida, Advocate v. Opposite Parties
High Court
09 Aug 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Mr. C. Parida, Advocate v. Opposite Parties
Date of order
09 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. C. Parida, Advocate v. Opposite Parties, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of aforesaid the writ petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.13045 of 2023
….
Diptimayee Panda
Petitioner
Represented By Adv. –
Mr. C. Parida, Advocate
-versus-
….
Opposite Parties
Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar and another
Represented By Adv. –
Mr. A. Kedia, Jr. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER09.08.2024
Order No.
05.
1. Mr. Parida, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner (assessee). He submits, the proceeding has been dropped. As such, his client has obtained her relief.
2. Mr. Kedia, learned advocate, Junior Standing Counsel appears on behalf of revenue.
3. In view of aforesaid the writ petition is disposed of.
(Arindam Sinha)
Signature Not Verified
Judge
Digitally SignedSigned by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOLDesignation: Junior StenographerReason: AuthenticationLocation: HIGH COURT OF ORISSADate: 09-Aug-2024 16:30:20
(M.S. Sahoo)
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue