Case Law › High Court › Mr. Chitrasen Parida, Advocate v. Princi...

Mr. Chitrasen Parida, Advocate v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of ….Opposite Partiesincome Tax, Odisha & Others

High Court 19 Dec 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

19 Dec 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Mr. Chitrasen Parida, Advocate v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of ….Opposite Partiesincome Tax, Odisha & Others, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Jharsuguda and others), the present writ petition is disposed of in the same terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.33662 of 2022 Hexa Steel and Power Private Limited ….Petitioner Mr. Chitrasen Parida, Advocate -versus- Principal Chief Commissioner of ….Opposite PartiesIncome Tax, Odisha & Others Mr. Sidharth Sankar Mohapatra, Sr. Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M. S. RAMAN ORDER 19.12.2022 Order No. 01. 1. Mr. Sidharth Sankar Mohapatra, learned Senior Standing counsel appearing for the Opposite Parties files his memo of appearance in Court today. The same be kept on record. 2. In view of the order dated 1[st] December, 2022 in W.P.(C) No.9191 of 2022 (Kailash Kedia and Others v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Jharsuguda and others), the present writ petition is disposed of in the same terms. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (M. S. Raman) Judge MRS/Laxmikant

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.