Mr. Chitrasen Parida, Advocate v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar And ….Opposite Partiesothers
High Court
15 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Mr. Chitrasen Parida, Advocate v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar And ….Opposite Partiesothers
Date of order
15 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Mr. Chitrasen Parida, Advocate v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar And ….Opposite Partiesothers, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Order No.
01.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.6414 of 2022
…. Petitioner
Namita Satpathy
Mr. Chitrasen Parida, Advocate
-versus-
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar and ….Opposite Partiesothers
Mr. T.K. Satapathy, Sr. Standing Counsel
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK
ORDER
15.03.2022
1. Considering that the sanction has been granted by the Addl.
CI, Range-1, Bhubaneswar in view of the reasons mentioned in the order dated 24[th] January, 2022 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.20919 of 2021 (M/s. Ambika Iron and Steel Pvt. Ltd. V. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax and others) and batch of cases, the impugned notice is quashed.
2. The writ petition is disposed of.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.