Mr Divyansree Singh, Advocates v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Cum Designated Authority International Taxation 2 New Delhi & Anr
High Court
22 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Mr Divyansree Singh, Advocates v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Cum Designated Authority International Taxation 2 New Delhi & Anr
Date of order
22 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Mr Divyansree Singh, Advocates v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Cum Designated Authority International Taxation 2 New Delhi & Anr, the High Court (2025) decided the matter under Section 244A of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: 5.The petition is disposed of in above manner.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~96
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(C) 14692/2025SMT NEERA JAIN LH OF LATE SH NAVAL KISHOR JAIN
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CUM DESIGNATEDAUTHORITY INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2NEW DELHI & ANR.
.....RespondentsThrough:MrGauravGupta,SSC,MrShivendra Singh, Mr Yojit Pareek,JSC and Mr Surya Jindal, Advocate
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
O R D E R22.09.2025
%
1.This petition is filed with the following prayers:-
“a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriatewrit, order or direction directing the Respondents toreleaseinterest amounting to Rs.1,17,660/-, underSection 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on accountof delay of more than 48 months in issuance of refundof Rs.4,80,247/- under DTVSV Act, 2020.”
2.Our attention has been drawn to annexure P3 to the writ petition,which is the representation made by the petitioner to the Commissioner ofIncome Tax cum Designated Authority on 26.05.2025with a prayer thatinterest be granted in line with the Section 244A of the Income Tax Act,1961 with effect from 31.05.2021. In fact, we note that the petitioner has
quantified the amount as well.
3.The petitioner has also placed before us a copy of the judgment in thecase of W.P.(C) No.1985/2022 titled Mrs.Anjul v. Office of PrincipalCommissioner of Income Tax-12 & Others decided on 04.11.2022 insupport of his submission.
4.If that be so, we dispose of this writ petition by directing theAssessing Officer to treat the present writ petition as a representation anddispose of the same by a reasoned and speaking order keeping in view thejudgments which have been referred to in the representation within a periodof eight weeks from today, as an outer limit. On the passing of the order andupon the said decision, the follow up action, if required shall be taken withina period of three weeks thereafter.
5.The petition is disposed of in above manner.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
VINOD KUMAR, J
SEPTEMBER 22, 2025M
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.