Case Law › High Court › Mr. G.m. Rath, Advocate v. The Deputy Co...

Mr. G.m. Rath, Advocate v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income

High Court 31 Jan 2023 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

31 Jan 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr. G.m. Rath, Advocate v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Order No. 07. S.K. Guin IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ITA No.22 of 2019 …. Appellant Sri Rakesh Modi Mr. G.M. Rath, Advocate -versus- …. Respondent The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Sambalpur Mr. R. Chimanka, Senior Standing Counsel CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN ORDER 08.02.2023 1. Office report has been perused. The words i.e., “writ appeal” which has been inadvertently reflected in the 2[nd] paragraph of the order dated 31[st] January 2023 in the present appeal be read as “ITA”. 2. The remaining part of the order dated 31[st] January 2023 passed in the present appeal shall remain unaltered. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (M.S. Raman) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.