Mr. H.m. Bhatia, Advocate For v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, On 17.11.2017
High Court
03 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Mr. H.m. Bhatia, Advocate For v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, On 17.11.2017
Date of order
03 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Mr. H.m. Bhatia, Advocate For v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, On 17.11.2017, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The order under challenge in this petition is quashed and set aside.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
WPMS No. 2468 of 2011 Hon’ble Rajiv Sharma, J.
Mr. S.K. Posti, Advocate for the
petitioner.
Mr. H.M. Bhatia, Advocate for
respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in WPMS No. 577 of 2014, M/s J.b. Memorial Manas Academy Management Society Vs. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, on 17.11.2017.
Accordingly, the present petition is also allowed in terms of the judgment cited hereinabove.
The order under challenge in this petition is quashed and set aside. The respondent-Department is directed to grant exemption to the petitioner-society for the relevant assessment year.
Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly.
(Rajiv Sharma, J.)
03.01.2018 Jitendra
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue