Case LawHigh Court › Mr. J.d. Mistri, Senior Advocate With v....

Mr. J.d. Mistri, Senior Advocate With v. This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Impugned

High Court 18 Nov 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mr. J.d. Mistri, Senior Advocate With v. This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Impugned
Date of order
18 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Mr. J.d. Mistri, Senior Advocate With v. This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Impugned, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2332 OF 2009 Mangalore Refinery & Petrochemicals Ltd. ..Appellant. V/s. Additional Director of Income Tax, Range 3, Mumbai..Respondent. Mr. J.D. Mistri, senior Advocate with V. Murlidhar with Rajesh Poojary i/b. Mulla & Mulla CB & C for the appellant. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ.DATED : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2011 P.C. :- 1. This appeal is filed by the assessee against the impugned order of the ITAT passed on 30/3/2009 in ITA No.3715/Mum/2007 relating to the assessment year 2003-04. In view of the subsequent order passed by the ITAT in M.A. No.02/Mum/2011 in ITA No.3715/ Mum/2007 on 2/9/2011 and the order of the assessing officer dated 8/2/2010 giving effect to the order of the ITAT, counsel for the appellant does not press this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs. 2.Refund of Court fees as per rules is allowed. (A.R. JOSHI, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan