Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Mr. J.m. Pattanaik, Advocate v. The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar And Others
Date of order
06 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
In Mr. J.m. Pattanaik, Advocate v. The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar And Others, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Order No.
01.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.7867 of 2022
Radharani Agency
…. Petitioner
Mr. J.M. Pattanaik, Advocate
-versus-
The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar and others
Opp. Parties
….
Mr. S.S. Mohapatra, Sr. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK
ORDER
06.04.2022
1. Since an assessment order has already been passed, the Court permits the Petitioner to withdraw the present petition to avail of the statutory remedy of an appeal in accordance with law. Any explanation offered before the CIT(A) for the delay in filing the appeal on account of pendency of the present petition will be considered on merits by the CIT(A). All points urged in the present petition are permitted to be urged before the CIT(A).
2. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue