In Mr. J.m. Pattnaik, Advocate v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of ….Opposite Partiesincome Tax & Others, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.2233 of 2015
….Petitioner
Sambalpur Development Authority
Mr. J.M. Pattnaik, Advocate
-versus-
Principal Chief Commissioner of ….Opposite PartiesIncome Tax & Others
Mr. Sidharth Sankar Mohapatra, Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department
Order No.
02.
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M. S. RAMAN
ORDER
15.11.2022
1. Mr. Sidharth Sankar Mohapatra, learned Senior Counsel files a
memo of appearance in Court today, which is taken on record.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that he has no instructions.
2. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(M. S. Raman)
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue