Case Law › High Court › Mr. K.k. Sahoo, Advocate v. Principal, C...

Mr. K.k. Sahoo, Advocate v. Principal, Commissioner Of Income Tax, Sambalpur And Another

High Court 16 Sep 2021 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

16 Sep 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Mr. K.k. Sahoo, Advocate v. Principal, Commissioner Of Income Tax, Sambalpur And Another, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Order No. 02. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.17705 of 2021 …. Petitioner M/s. Utkal Steels Ltd. Mr. K.K. Sahoo, Advocate -versus- …. Principal, Commissioner of Income Tax, Sambalpur and another Opp. Parties Mr. S.S. Mohapatra, Sr. Standing Counsel (Income Tax) CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B.P. ROUTRAY ORDER 16.09.2021 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner points out that the matter has been rendered infructuous. 2. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (B.P. Routray) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.