Mr. L.k. Maharana, Advocate v. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, New Delhi And Another
High Court
24 Jun 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Mr. L.k. Maharana, Advocate v. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, New Delhi And Another
Date of order
24 Jun 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Mr. L.k. Maharana, Advocate v. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, New Delhi And Another, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.14656 of 2024
…..
Sambeet Ray
Petitioner
Mr. L.K. Maharana, Advocate
Vs.
…..
National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, New Delhi and another
Opposite Parties
Mr. S. C. Mohanty, Sr. SC along with Mr. A. Kedia, Jr. SC for Revenue Mr. A. Kedia, Jr. SC for Revenue
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
Order No.
01.
ORDER 24.06.2024
This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the ex parte assessment order dated 30.03.2022 passed by the authority under Annexure-1 Series. parte assessment order dated 30.03.2022 passed by the authority under Annexure-1 Series.
4. As it appears, the petitioner has approached this Court against the ex parte assessment order passed by the authority. In the meantime more than two years have passed and, as such, against the order of assessment appeal lies. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to pursue its remedy before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. the ex parte assessment order passed by the authority. In the meantime more than two years have passed and, as such, against the order of assessment appeal lies. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to pursue its remedy before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
5. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally SignedSigned by: SUBHASMITA DASDesignation: Sr. StenographerReason: AuthenticationLocation: High Court of OrissaDate: 27-Jun-2024 17:34:13
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(G. SATAPATHY)
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.