Mr. M v. Heard
High Court
22 Mar 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Mr. M v. Heard
Date of order
22 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. M v. Heard, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 265 OF 2012IN
TAX APPEAL NO. 23 OF 2012
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VersusM/S. SOCIODADE DE FOMENTO INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., (THROUGH LEGAL MANEGER )
... Applicant
... Respondent
Mr. M. V. Sheshachala and Mr. K. V. Arvind with Ms. Asha Dessai,Advocates for the applicant. Mr. P. J. Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sudin M. S.Usgaokar, Advocate for the respondent.
P.C.:-
-Coram:S. C. DHARMADHIKARI &U. V. BAKRE, JJ.-Date:22nd March, 2012
Heard.
2. For the reason that we have confined the substantial
questions of law, no relief can be granted in this application. CivilMisc. Application is disposed of accordingly.
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
ssm.
U. V. BAKRE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue