Mr. Nageswar Rao And Mr. Parth, Advocates v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
High Court
10 May 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Mr. Nageswar Rao And Mr. Parth, Advocates v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
Date of order
10 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Mr. Nageswar Rao And Mr. Parth, Advocates v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~4 & 5
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4152/2024MOL CORPORATION ..... Petitioner
..... Petitioner Mr. Nageswar Rao and Mr. Parth, Advocates Parth, Advocates
Through:
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS.
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr. Asheesh Jain, CGSC with Mr. Gaurav Kumar and Ms. Neha Narang, Advocates Mr. Sanjay Kumar and Ms. Easha, Advocates Mr. Gaurav Kumar and Ms. Neha Narang, Advocates Mr. Sanjay Kumar and Ms. Easha, Advocates
5
+ W.P.(C) 4153/2024
MOL CORPORATION
..... Petitioner Mr. Nageswar Rao and Mr. Parth, Advocates
Through:
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS.
..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, CGSC with Mr. Gaurav Kumar and Ms. Neha Narang, Advocates Mr. Sanjay Kumar and Ms. Easha, Advocates Mr. Gaurav Kumar and Ms. Neha Narang, Advocates Mr. Sanjay Kumar and Ms. Easha, Advocates
%
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R10.05.2024
1.Mr. Rao, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, states that although the refunds have been duly released, certain issues
with respect to quantification still remain. He, however, submits that the petitions may be disposed of subject to liberty being reserved to the writ petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings, if so chosen and advised.
2.Ordered accordingly.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
MAY 10, 2024 p’ma
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.