Case Law › High Court › Mr. P.c. Nayak, Advocate v. Income Tax O...

Mr. P.c. Nayak, Advocate v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1), Bhubaneswar And Another

High Court 30 Apr 2024 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

30 Apr 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Mr. P.c. Nayak, Advocate v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1), Bhubaneswar And Another, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ITA No. 87 of 2023 …..Appellant Chinari Rohini Subudhi Mr. P.C. Nayak, Advocate Vs. …..Respondents Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1), Bhubaneswar and another Mr. S.C. Mohanty, Sr. Standing Counsel for I.T. Deptt. CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY ORDER30.04.2024 Order No.02. This matter is taken up by hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. It stated that the issue involved in this ITA is analogous to W.P.(C) No. 2487 of 2019 (Rabindra Kumar Mohanty v. The Registrar, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack), which has been disposed of by this Court, vide judgment dated 18.03.2020. 4. Therefore, in view of the detailed reasons stated in the judgment dated 18.03.2020 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 2487 of 2019 (Rabindra Kumar Mohanty v. The Registrar, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack), this ITA stands disposed of in terms of the said judgment. Signature Not Verified Digitally SignedSigned by: PRIYAJIT SAHOODesignation: Jr. StenographerReason: AuthenticationLocation: HIGH COURT OF ORISSAPriyajitDate: 02-May-2024 13:56:23 (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (G. SATAPATHY) JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.