In Mr. P.c. Sethi, Advocate v. Income Tax Officer, Rayagada, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn I terms of the memo filed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
I.T.A. No.64 of 2011
…. Appellant Mr. P.C. Sethi, Advocate …. Respondents
Jami Gouri Prasad
Mr. P.C. Sethi, Advocate
-versus-
Income Tax Officer, Rayagada
Ward and others
Mr. T.K. Satapathy, Senior Standing Counsel
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE B.P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
01.12.2021
Order No.
4. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the Appellant seeks leave to
withdraw the present appeal. A memo filed to that effect is taken on record.
2. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn I terms of
the memo filed.
3. An urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per rules.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
S.K. Guin
( B.P. Routray )
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.