Mr. P.j. Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate A/W. Mr. Madhur Agrawal I/B. Mr. Atul v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj
High Court
04 Dec 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mr. P.j. Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate A/W. Mr. Madhur Agrawal I/B. Mr. Atul v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj
Date of order
04 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. P.j. Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate A/W. Mr. Madhur Agrawal I/B. Mr. Atul v. Amit B. Borkar, Jj, the High Court (2021) decided the matter under Section 144C of the Income-tax Act.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
Digitallysigned byGAURIGAURI AMITGAEKWADAMITDate:GAEKWAD2021.12.0614:50:47+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2372 OF 2021
Mr. P.J. Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Madhur Agrawal i/b. Mr. Atul
K. Jasani for petitioner.Mr. Sham V. Walve for respondents-Revenue.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 4[th] DECEMBER 2021
AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
P.C. :
1Mr. Walve, counsel for petitioner, as an officer of the Court andin fairness, states that petitioner is not unjustified in raising their grievancein this petition. There has been an error in passing the draft assessmentorder under Section 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the said Act)without following the procedure prescribed under Section 144B of the saidAct. Mr. Walve states that, therefore, the order impugned dated23[rd] September 2021, copy whereof is at Exhbit "L" to the petition, bequashed and set aside and the matter be remanded for denovoconsideration to the stage of show cause notice cum draft assessment orderunder Section 144B of the said Act.
2Ordered accordingly.
3The show cause notice cum draft assessment order underSection 144B of the said Act be issued within four weeks from today.
4
Petition disposed.
(AMIT B. BORKAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.