Mr. Pradeep Garg v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
08 Jul 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Mr. Pradeep Garg v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
08 Jul 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Mr. Pradeep Garg v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3750/2020
Mr. Pradeep Garg S/o Shri Ram Lal Garg, Aged About 53 Years,R/o 81B, Vinayakam, Lohagal Road, Ajmer, Former Director OfM/s Raj Autowheels (P) Ltd.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, 6, New FatehpuraSahelia Marg, Udaipur.Sahelia Marg, Udaipur.
2. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central RevenueBuilding, Jaipur Road, Ajmer.Building, Jaipur Road, Ajmer.
3. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-I, OppositeCentral Bus Stand, Jaipur Bench, Ajmer.Central Bus Stand, Jaipur Bench, Ajmer.
4. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range I, OppositeCentral Bus Stand, Jaipur Bench, Ajmer.Central Bus Stand, Jaipur Bench, Ajmer.
5. Tax Recovery Officer, Opposite Central Bus Stand, JaipurBench, Ajmer.Bench, Ajmer.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dilip SharmaFor Respondent(s): For Respondent(s):
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Order
08/07/2020
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw thiswrit petition.
This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.