Mr. Prajnaraj Mohanty, Advocate v. Income Tax Officer, Ward Tds, Sambalpur & Others
High Court
16 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Mr. Prajnaraj Mohanty, Advocate v. Income Tax Officer, Ward Tds, Sambalpur & Others
Date of order
16 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. Prajnaraj Mohanty, Advocate v. Income Tax Officer, Ward Tds, Sambalpur & Others, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) Nos.6659 & 6660 of 2022
H L Infrastructure, Ghasipura, Salapada, Anandapur
Petitioner
….
Mr. Prajnaraj Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
Income Tax Officer, Ward TDS, Sambalpur & Others
….Opposite Parties
Mr. S.S.Mohapatra, Sr.Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER
16.03.2022
01.
1. Considering that the Petitioner has already filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) which is stated to be pending, this Court sees no reason why it should entertain writ petitions when all the grounds urged here can be raised before the CIT (A) in the pending appeal.
2. Leaving it open to the Petitioner to do so, the Court declines to interfere in the present petitions at this stage. As regards the prayer for interim relief, it will be open to the Petitioner to seek appropriate interim reliefs in the pending appeal before the CIT (A) in accordance with law.
3. The Court directs the CIT (A) to dispose of the pending appeals as expeditiously as possible and in any event not later than 2[nd]
Page 1 of 2
September, 2022. This Court clarifies that it has not expressed any view on merits.
4. The writ petitions are disposed of in the above terms.
5. An urgent certified copy be issued as per Rules.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice ( R.K.Pattanaik )
Judge
Kabita/Tudu
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.