Case Law › High Court › Mr. Prajnaraj Mohanty, Advocate v. Ito,...

Mr. Prajnaraj Mohanty, Advocate v. Ito, Ward, Bhadrak, Income Tax Office, Charampa, Bhadrak & Others

High Court 16 Nov 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

16 Nov 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Mr. Prajnaraj Mohanty, Advocate v. Ito, Ward, Bhadrak, Income Tax Office, Charampa, Bhadrak & Others, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.8150 of 2022 ….Petitioner Sahabaj Khan Mr. Prajnaraj Mohanty, Advocate -versus- …. ITO, Ward, Bhadrak, Income Tax Office, Charampa, Bhadrak & Others Opposite Parties Mr. Sidharth Sankar Mohapatra, Sr. Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M. S. RAMAN ORDER16.11.2022 Order No. 01. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the matter has been rendered infructuous. 2. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (M. S. Raman) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.