In Mr. Prakash Ch. Sethi, Advocate v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Order No.
05.
S. Behera
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ITA No.108 of 2009
Appellant
Asutosh Mohapatra (HUF)
….
Mr. Prakash Ch. Sethi, Advocate
-versus-
….Respondents
Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax and others
Mr. T.K. Satapathy, Senior Standing Counsel
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
22.02.2022
1. Learned counsel appearing for the Appellant states that he has no instructions in the matter.
2. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R. K. Pattanaik)
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.