Case Law › High Court › Mr. Puneet Rai, Advocate v. Nokia Soluti...

Mr. Puneet Rai, Advocate v. Nokia Solution & Network India Pvt Ltd (Formerly Known As, Nokia Siemens

High Court 14 May 2018 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

14 May 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr. Puneet Rai, Advocate v. Nokia Solution & Network India Pvt Ltd (Formerly Known As, Nokia Siemens, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed along with pending application.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 563/2018 & CM APPL. 19740/2018 PR. COMMISSIONRER OF INCOME TAX-6 Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Puneet Rai, Advocate. versus NOKIA SOLUTION & NETWORK INDIA PVT LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS, NOKIA SIEMENS) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra and Mr. Ankul Goyal, Advocates. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R % 14.05.2018 The extension of interim order is the subject matter of this appeal by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This issue is covered by the judgment of this Court in ‘Pepsi Foods Pvt. Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax’, 376 ITR 87. Consequently, no question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed along with pending application. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J MAY 14, 2018 nn A. K. CHAWLA, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.