Mr. Puneet Rai, Advs v. Jbm Auto Ltd

$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 1118/2018 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -5 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia & Mr. Puneet Rai, Advs. versus JBM AUTO LTD. ..... Respondent Through: none. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R% 11.12.2018 CM No.52020/2018 in ITA 1118/2018 Registry will correct the name of the respondent on the file cover. This appeal was disposed of being a part of batch of appeals. This application has been filed stating that the impugned orders enclosed with the grounds of appeal were incomplete as pages were missing and were also not correct. We allow the present application with the observation that the learned counsel should have been careful to ensure that the complete and correct orders were placed on record. Registry should have also examined the orders enclosed with the grounds of appeal. Registry shall issue directions to the dealing assistants. With the aforesaid observations, the application is disposed of permitting the appellant to place on record complete and correct orders. SANJIV KHANNA, J DECEMBER 11, 2018 ak ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J