Case LawHigh Court › Mr. Puneet Rai With Mr. Ruchir v. Fortun...

Mr. Puneet Rai With Mr. Ruchir v. Fortune Society For Development And Promotion Of International Business

High Court 14 Mar 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Mr. Puneet Rai With Mr. Ruchir v. Fortune Society For Development And Promotion Of International Business
Date of order
14 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr. Puneet Rai With Mr. Ruchir v. Fortune Society For Development And Promotion Of International Business, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 299/2018 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -EXEMPTION ..... Appellant Through: Bhatia, Advs. Mr. Puneet Rai with Mr. Ruchir versus FORTUNE SOCIETY FOR DEVELOPMENT AND PROMOTION OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R % 14.03.2018 The Revenue questions the dismissal of its appeal on a question about the permissibility of exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter referred to as “the Act”) to the assessee as a society set up to provide education. The ITAT ruled in favour of the assessee by placing reliance on Deputy Director of Income Tax v. Indraprastha Cancer Society (ITA 240/2014 decided on 18.11.2014). In these circumstances, having regard to the object of the assessee society as well as the previous rulings of the Court, no question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J MARCH 14, 2018/kks A. K. CHAWLA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan