Mr. R. Chimanka, Advocatesenior Standing Counsel (It v. Orissa Cricket Association
High Court
13 Jul 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Mr. R. Chimanka, Advocatesenior Standing Counsel (It v. Orissa Cricket Association
Date of order
13 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
2011-2012
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. R. Chimanka, Advocatesenior Standing Counsel (It v. Orissa Cricket Association, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Order No.
06.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
I.T.A. No.56 of 2018
….Appellant
Commissioner of Income Tax, (Exemption), Hyderabad
Mr. R. Chimanka, AdvocateSenior Standing Counsel (IT)
-versus-
….RespondentRespondent
Orissa Cricket Association,
Cuttack
Mr. S. Ray, Senior Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
13.07.2023
1. Revenue has preferred appeal against common order dated
26[th] December, 2017 covering ITA no.210/CTK/2016, pertaining to assessment year 2011-2012.
2. Mr. Chimanka, learned advocate, Senior Standing Counsel
appears on behalf of appellant/revenue and Mr. Ray, learned senior advocate, for respondent/assessee. advocate, for respondent/assessee.
3. This day we have dealt with impugned common order by our
judgment in ITA no.55 of 2018 (CIT vs. Orissa Cricket Association). This appeal stands covered by the judgment. In the circumstances, the substantial question of law framed in ITA no.55 Association). This appeal stands covered by the judgment. In the circumstances, the substantial question of law framed in ITA no.55
P.Pradhan
of 2018 is deemed to have been framed herein and answered
accordingly.
4. The appeal is disposed of.
(Arindam Sinha)
Judge
(S.K. Mishra)
Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally SignedSigned by: PRASANT KUMAR PRADHANDesignation: Personal AssistantReason: AuthenticationLocation: High Court of Orissa, CuttackDate: 14-Jul-2023 17:59:20
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.