In Mr. R. Chimanka, Senior Standing Counsel v. Opposite Party, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: The petition is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Order No.
07.
S.K. Guin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK STREV No.92 of 2007
….Petitioner
Commissioner of Income Tax, Orissa, Bhubaneswar
Mr. R. Chimanka, Senior Standing Counsel
-versus-
….
Opposite Party
M/s Baker Eastern
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER18.05.2022
1. Despite 15 years having elapsed, no steps have been taken seeking condonation of delay in filing the revision petition.
2. The petition is accordingly dismissed.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.