Mr. Raj Kumar v. Cit, Chandigarh
High Court
18 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Mr. Raj Kumar v. Cit, Chandigarh
Date of order
18 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. Raj Kumar v. Cit, Chandigarh, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 104 of 2005 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 18.1.2016
Mr. Raj Kumar
Versus
....Appellant.
CIT, Chandigarh
...Respondent.
1.Whether the Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?the judgment?
2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG.
PRESENT: Mr. S.K. Mukhi, Advocate for the appellant.
Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate for the respondent.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
For orders, see ITA No. 47 of 2005 (Mr. Surender Paul v.
CIT, Chandigarh).
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)
JUDGE
January 18, 2016
gbs
(RAJ RAHUL GARG)
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue