Case Law › High Court › Mr. R.p. Kar, Advocate v. Income Tax Off...

Mr. R.p. Kar, Advocate v. Income Tax Officer, Jajpur Ward, Jajpur And Another

High Court 14 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

14 Mar 2022

Assessment year(s)

2013-14

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Mr. R.p. Kar, Advocate v. Income Tax Officer, Jajpur Ward, Jajpur And Another, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is accordingly allowed but no cost.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 148 case law →

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.4649 of 2022 Mirza Adil Iqubal Baig …. Petitioner Mr. R.P. Kar, Advocate -versus- Income Tax Officer, Jajpur Ward, Jajpur and another ….Opposite Parties Mr. T.K. Satapathy, Sr. Standing Counsel Income Tax CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA Order No. ORDER14.03.2022 03. 1. In the present case, notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act 1961 dated 23[rd] March, 2021 for the assessment year 2013-14, which more than six years after expiry of the assessment year in question, has been challenged. In similar circumstances vide order dated 24[th]January, 2022 in W.P.(C) No.20919 of 2021(M/s. Ambika Iron and Steel Pvt. Ltd. Vrs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax and othersand other batch of similar cases) and order dated 8[th]September, 2021 in W.P.(C) No.26533 of 2021 (Biswajit Karmakar vrs. The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar and others), this Court has quashed identical notices. Page 1 of 2 2. In such view of the matter, the impugned notice and all consequential steps taken thereunder stands quashed. 3. The writ petition is accordingly allowed but no cost. 4. Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice ( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge R.K. Singh/Jagabandhu

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.