Case LawHigh Court › Mr. R.s. Chimanka, Senior Standing Couns...

Mr. R.s. Chimanka, Senior Standing Counselmr. Avinash Kedia, Junior Standing Counselmr. Avinash Kedia, Junior Standing Counsel v. M/S. Hansa Sudhakar Doshi ….Opposite Partycharitable Trust

High Court 03 Mar 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Mr. R.s. Chimanka, Senior Standing Counselmr. Avinash Kedia, Junior Standing Counselmr. Avinash Kedia, Junior Standing Counsel v. M/S. Hansa Sudhakar Doshi ….Opposite Partycharitable Trust
Date of order
03 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr. R.s. Chimanka, Senior Standing Counselmr. Avinash Kedia, Junior Standing Counselmr. Avinash Kedia, Junior Standing Counsel v. M/S. Hansa Sudhakar Doshi ….Opposite Partycharitable Trust, the High Court (2023) decided the matter under Section 12A of the Income-tax Act.

Decision: The review petition is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RVWPET No. 126 of 2019 Commissioner of Income Tax ….Petitioner(Exemptions) Mr. R.S. Chimanka, Senior Standing CounselMr. Avinash Kedia, Junior Standing CounselMr. Avinash Kedia, Junior Standing Counsel -versus- M/s. Hansa Sudhakar Doshi ….Opposite PartyCharitable Trust None CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA Order No. ORDER03.03.2023 02. 1. Mr. R.S. Chimanka, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Petitioner-Income Tax Department points out that the matter pertains to registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and not raising any issue of monetary limit of the tax effect. Consequently, the circular in that regard is not applicable. Petitioner-Income Tax Department points out that the matter pertains to registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and not raising any issue of monetary limit of the tax effect. Consequently, the circular in that regard is not applicable. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, the order dated 3[rd] December, 2018 disposing of I.T.A. No.35 of 2018 is recalled and the said ITA is restored to its original file. 2018 disposing of I.T.A. No.35 of 2018 is recalled and the said ITA is restored to its original file. 3. The review petition is accordingly disposed of. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan