Case LawHigh Court › Mr. R.s. Chimanka, Sr. Standing Counsel...

Mr. R.s. Chimanka, Sr. Standing Counsel v. Orissa Computer Academy, Bhubaneswar

High Court 17 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Mr. R.s. Chimanka, Sr. Standing Counsel v. Orissa Computer Academy, Bhubaneswar
Date of order
17 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mr. R.s. Chimanka, Sr. Standing Counsel v. Orissa Computer Academy, Bhubaneswar, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal.

Issue: The question sought to be urged is whether the ITAT is justifying in deleting the addition of Rs.1,33,90,000/- on account of receipt of capitation fee?

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Order No. 02. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK I.T.A. No.86 of 2012 Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar …. Appellant Mr. R.S. Chimanka, Sr. Standing Counsel -versus- …. Respondent Orissa Computer Academy, Bhubaneswar CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK ORDER 17.02.2022 1. The challenge by the Department in the present appeal is to an order dated 25[th] April, 2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack (ITAT) in IT(SS)A Nos.56, 57, 58, 59 and 60/CTK/2009 for the Assessment Years (AYs) 2000-01 to 2004-05. 2. The question sought to be urged is whether the ITAT is justifying in deleting the addition of Rs.1,33,90,000/- on account of receipt of capitation fee? Having carefully perused the concurrent orders of both CIT(A) and ITAT on this aspect, the Court is of the view that it turns entirely on facts and gives rise to no substantial question of law. Accordingly, the Court Page 1 of 2 KC Bisoi // 2 // declines to frame the questions as prayed for. The appeal is dismissed. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan