Mr. R.s. Chimanka, Sr. Standing Counsel v. Orissa Computer Academy, Bhubaneswar
High Court
17 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Mr. R.s. Chimanka, Sr. Standing Counsel v. Orissa Computer Academy, Bhubaneswar
Date of order
17 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. R.s. Chimanka, Sr. Standing Counsel v. Orissa Computer Academy, Bhubaneswar, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal.
Issue: The question sought to be urged is whether the ITAT is justifying in deleting the addition of Rs.1,33,90,000/- on account of receipt of capitation fee?
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Order No.
02.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
I.T.A. No.86 of 2012
Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar
….
Appellant
Mr. R.S. Chimanka, Sr. Standing Counsel
-versus-
….
Respondent
Orissa Computer Academy, Bhubaneswar
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK
ORDER
17.02.2022
1. The challenge by the Department in the present appeal is to an order dated 25[th] April, 2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack (ITAT) in IT(SS)A Nos.56, 57, 58, 59 and 60/CTK/2009 for the Assessment Years (AYs) 2000-01 to 2004-05.
2. The question sought to be urged is whether the ITAT is justifying in deleting the addition of Rs.1,33,90,000/- on account of receipt of capitation fee? Having carefully perused the concurrent orders of both CIT(A) and ITAT on this aspect, the Court is of the view that it turns entirely on facts and gives rise to no substantial question of law. Accordingly, the Court
Page 1 of 2
KC Bisoi
// 2 //
declines to frame the questions as prayed for. The appeal is dismissed.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.