In Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Adv v. Nec Technologies India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: The appeal is therefore dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~82
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 59/2019 & CM Appl. 3364/2019
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -6 Through:
..... Appellant
Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Adv.
versus
NEC TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT. LTD.
..... Respondent
Through:
Mr. Ankit D. Agrawal, Adv.
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHATHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
%
O R D E R23.01.2019
1.The Revenue’s grievance in this appeal under Section 260A is with respect to the ITAT’s interim order staying recovery of the demand. It is urged that the order impugned is contrary to Section 254(2A). 2.It is not disputed that the question with respect to the period during which the stay of demand is permissible has been decided against the Revenue by this Court in Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (2015) 376 ITR 87. 3.Therefore, no substantial question of law arises. The appeal is therefore dismissed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
JANUARY 23, 2019 „pv‟
PRATEEK JALAN, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue