Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate v. Ge Transportation Parts Llc
High Court
02 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate v. Ge Transportation Parts Llc
Date of order
02 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate v. Ge Transportation Parts Llc, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: 20,20,281/-, the present appeal is disposed of as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~47.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 790/2019 and CM APPL. 39089/2019
–THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1
..... Appellant
Through:
Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate.
versus
GE TRANSPORTATION PARTS LLC
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Sachit Jolly and Mr. Vasudevan G., Advocates.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
%
O R D E R02.09.2019
In the light of the circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes (Judicial Section), Government of India, which fixes the monetary limit in respect of tax effect, inter alia, before the High Court in which the Department could pursue the matter as Rs. 1,00,00,000/- and in view of the fact that the tax effect in the present case is Rs. 20,20,281/-, the present appeal is disposed of as not pressed.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
SEPTEMBER 02, 2019/kd
SANJEEV NARULA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue