Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Ssc v. Siemens Industry Software Ltd. (Formerly Known As Mentor Graphics (Ireland) Ltd
High Court
22 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Ssc v. Siemens Industry Software Ltd. (Formerly Known As Mentor Graphics (Ireland) Ltd
Date of order
22 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Ssc v. Siemens Industry Software Ltd. (Formerly Known As Mentor Graphics (Ireland) Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Ltd.[Delhi High Court order dated 14 February 2024 passed in ITA 144/2023] 2.Consequently, the appeal fails and shall stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~68
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 195/2024
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3
..... Appellant
Through:
Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC
versus
SIEMENS INDUSTRY SOFTWARE LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MENTOR GRAPHICS (IRELAND) LTD.
..... Respondent
Through: Syali, Advs.
Mr. Mayank Negi, Ms. Husnal
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R
% 22.03.2024
CM APPL. 18107/2024 (delay)
Bearing in mind the disclosures made, the delay of 91 days in refiling the appeal is condoned.
The application shall stand disposed of.
ITA 195/2024
1.Having heard Mr. Bhatia, learned counsel representing the appellant, we find that the view taken by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is clearly unexceptionable being in accord with the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court in Engineering Analysis Centre for Excellence vs. CIT [(2022) 3 SCC 321]as well of thisCourt in
The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 vs. Relx inc [Delhi High Court order dated 07 February 2024 passed in
ITA 630/2023] and The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 vs. Salesforce.com Singapore Pte. Ltd.[Delhi High Court order dated 14 February 2024 passed in ITA 144/2023]
2.Consequently, the appeal fails and shall stand dismissed.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
MARCH 22, 2024/neha
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.