Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate With Mr v. Authority For Advance Rulings (Income Tax) & Ors
High Court
27 Nov 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate With Mr v. Authority For Advance Rulings (Income Tax) & Ors
Date of order
27 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate With Mr v. Authority For Advance Rulings (Income Tax) & Ors, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 7157/2017
MASTERCARD ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LTD. Through Piyush Kaushik, Advocate.
..... Petitioner
Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
versus
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) & ORS. ..... Respondent
..... Respondent Through Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Sr. Standing Counsel.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
%
O R D E R27.11.2017
Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner on instructions states that hearings have commenced before the Authority for Advance Rulings. However, he submits that an early disposal is required as the matter is pending for the last four years and the petitioner has deposited about Rs.330 crores. It is also stated that the respondents have now sent a long questionnaire to the customers of the petitioner and this may further delay the matter.
Be that as it may, as the proceedings have commenced, it is open to the petitioner to press for early and expeditious disposal before the Authority for Advance Rulings. We are sure that if such a request is made, the same will be considered.
With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
At this stage, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner states that orders on the applications filed by the customers under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 have not been passed. We are not aware of the said position. It is always open to the said customers to take appropriate steps. We clarify that we have not made any comments on the said aspect as the said issue is not the subject matter of the present writ petition.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
NOVEMBER 27, 2017 NA
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.