Case Law › High Court › Mr. S. Ray, Advocate v. Commissioner Of...

Mr. S. Ray, Advocate v. Commissioner Of Income Taxes, Orissa, Cuttack And Another …

High Court 03 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

03 Aug 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Mr. S. Ray, Advocate v. Commissioner Of Income Taxes, Orissa, Cuttack And Another …, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Order No. 09. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.23409 of 2013 M/s. Kalinga Sponge Iron Ltd. …. Petitioner Mr. S. Ray, Advocate -versus- Commissioner of Income Taxes, Orissa, Cuttack and another …. Opp. Parties Mr. Sunil, Mishra, Sr. Standing Counsel CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK ORDER03.08.2022 1. In the light of the judgment of the Full Bench dated 31[st]March, 2022 in W.P.(C) No.16957 of 2009 (M/s. Pal Construction v. The Assessing Authority, Bhubaneswar-I Circle and others) and the consequent order dated 18[th] April, 2022 and consequent order dated 8[th] December, 2021 in W.P.(C) No.23871 of 2014 read with the judgment in Jindal Stainless Ltd. (now JSL Ltd.) v. State of Orissa (2012) 54 VST 1 (Orissa), the impugned assessment order (Annexure-1) is hereby quashed. 2. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.