Mr. S. Ray, Senior Advocate v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, …. Opposite Partiesrourkela And Others
High Court
17 Jul 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Mr. S. Ray, Senior Advocate v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, …. Opposite Partiesrourkela And Others
Date of order
17 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Mr. S. Ray, Senior Advocate v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, …. Opposite Partiesrourkela And Others, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 16689 of 2023
Dilpreet Singh Chhabra
…. Petitioner
Mr. S. Ray, Senior Advocate
-versus-
Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, …. Opposite PartiesRourkela and others
Mr. S.S. Mohapatra,
Sr. Standing Counsel (Revenue)
CORAM:
JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Order No.
2.
ORDER
22.08.2023 W.P.(C) no.16689 of 2023 and I.A. no.12695 of 2023
1.Mr. Ray, learned senior advocate appears on behalf of
applicant-assessee and submits, the writ petition was dealt with by judgment dated 17[th] July, 2023. However, direction to file revised
return for assessment year 2018-19 could not be availed of by
applicant because the portal does not allow for it. Hence, the application with prayer for appropriate modification of the judgment.
2.Mr. Mohapatra, learned advocate, Senior Standing Counsel appears on behalf of revenue and prays for adjournment to obtain instruction. Mr. Ray prays for extension of the period directed by the
Page 1 of 2
judgment. Mr. Mohapatra submits, revenue is aware of the direction
and also the modification application. In the circumstances, no direction need specifically be made at the stage.
3.List on 12[th] September, 2023.
(Arindam Sinha)
Judge
(S.K. Mishra)
Judge
Sks
Signature Not Verified
Digitally SignedSigned by: SISIR KUMAR SETHIDesignation: PERSONAL ASSISTANTReason: AuthenticationLocation: ORISSA HIGH COURTDate: 22-Aug-2023 17:50:11
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue