Mr. S. Ray, Senior Advocatemr. Diganta Das, Advocate v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal …
High Court
03 Jul 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Mr. S. Ray, Senior Advocatemr. Diganta Das, Advocate v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal …
Date of order
03 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Mr. S. Ray, Senior Advocatemr. Diganta Das, Advocate v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal …, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 18701 of 2016
Orissa Cricket Association
…. Appellant
Mr. S. Ray, Senior AdvocateMr. Diganta Das, Advocate
-versus-
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal …. Respondent
Mr. Radheyshyam Chimanka, Senior Standing CounselMr. A. Kedia, Junior Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Order No.4.
ORDER03.07.2023
1.Mr. Ray, learned senior advocate, briefed by Mr. Diganta Das,
learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, he has instructions that his client does not want to prosecute the writ petition.
2.Mr. Chimanka, learned advocate, Senior Standing Counsel appears on behalf of revenue.
3.We find the petition was directed to be listed along with ITA
no.151 of 2018 (CIT v. Cuttack District Tennis Association).
Nevertheless, as petitioner does not want to prosecute the writ petition,
we accept the position and dismissed it.
(Arindam Sinha)
Judge
(S.K. Mishra)
Judge
Jyoti/RKS
Signature Not Verified
Digitally SignedSigned by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOLReason: AuthenticationLocation: HIGH COURT OF ORISSADate: 07-Jul-2023 15:07:27
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.