Mr. S. Tibrewal, Advocate v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Hyderabad And Others
High Court
22 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Mr. S. Tibrewal, Advocate v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Hyderabad And Others
Date of order
22 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
2022-23
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Mr. S. Tibrewal, Advocate v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Hyderabad And Others, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 6993 of 2024
…..
Sakrabati Narasingh Child Hospital, Trust of Rotary Club, Sambalpur
Petitioner
Mr. S. Tibrewal, Advocate
Vs.
…..
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Hyderabad and others
Opposite Parties
Mr. A. Kedia, Jr. SC for Revenue
CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
Order No.
01.
ORDER
22.03.2024
This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.
2. Mr. S. Tibrewal, learned counsel for the Petitioner-assessee and submits that the present writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the order dated 24.07.2023 passed in the similar matter i.e., W.P.(C) No.22474 of 2023.
3. Mr. S. Tibrewal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner further submits that the Petitioner filed application in wrong section code in Form-10A pertaining to the Assessment Year 2022-23. The application was rejected by the impugned order dated 11.03.2023. He prays to set aside the impugned order and direct the Opposite Parties-Revenue to accept the Form-10A.
4. Learned Standing Counsel for the Opposite Parties-Revenue and justifies the impugned order.
5. Perused the impugned order. On query from this Court, Mr. S. Tibrewal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner demonstrate that under cover of notice dated 02.12.2022 under
Annexure-6, certain requisitions were made for furnishing information. The Petitioner by letter dated 10.12.2022 under Annexure-7 Series furnished the information. The requisition and compliance were both digitally done. He then draws attention to impugned order to submit that there is no dispute regarding information received by opposite parties-Revenue.
6. For ready reference, third paragraph of the impugned order is reproduced hereunder:-
“However, there is no response from the assessee so far, and has not filed any information or documentary evidence. In light of the above facts, the application for registration in Form No.10AB is considered carefully. As the case is to be decided in time bound manner, after considering the facts and non-submission of mandatory information, the application filed by the assessee in Form No.10AB seeking registration u/s 12AB, is herewith “Rejected”.”
7. In the requisition for information under Annexure-6, various information were sought, which also included query on reason for filing Form-10A in wrong section code for Assessment Year 2022-23 (F.Y. 2021-22).
8. Perusal of Annexure-7 Series dated 10.12.2022, it appears that the Trustee of Sakrabati Narasingh Child Hospital, Trust of Rotary Club, Sambalpur has furnished explanation sought for regarding Form-10A. Though, the explanation is stated to have been furnished to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Income Tax Department, Hyderbad, the same has not been considered in its proper prospective by assigning reason, which is one of the essential facets of principles of natural justice. However, vide order dated 11.03.2023 passed by the CIT (Exemption), Hyderbad, the application of the Petitioner-Assessee for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act stood rejected.
9. In the circumstances, the order dated 11.03.2023 under Annexure-9, being without reason as is apparent from the record, stands set aside and it is directed that the application for registration under Section 12AB is restored for reconsideration by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Hyderbad. Needless to say that the said authority before taking decision may afford a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
10. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (G. SATAPATHY) JUDGE
Subhasmita
Signature Not Verified
Digitally SignedSigned by: SUBHASMITA DASDesignation: Sr. StenographerReason: AuthenticationLocation: High Court of OrissaDate: 27-Mar-2024 17:47:26
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.