Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal & Mr. D.r. Jain, Advocates v. Board For Industrial & Financial Reconstruction, New Delhi & Ors
High Court
23 Mar 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal & Mr. D.r. Jain, Advocates v. Board For Industrial & Financial Reconstruction, New Delhi & Ors
Date of order
23 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal & Mr. D.r. Jain, Advocates v. Board For Industrial & Financial Reconstruction, New Delhi & Ors, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of decision: 23.03.2011
+ WP (C) No.1957of 2011
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX (ADMN.) & ANR., NEW DELHI
…PETITIONERS
Through:
Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal & Mr. D.R. Jain, Advocates.
Versus
BOARD FOR INDUSTRIAL & FINANCIAL RECONSTRUCTION, NEW DELHI & ORS.
...RESPONDENTS
Through:
Nemo.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
1.Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.To be referred to Reporter or not?
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? reported in the Digest?
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. (Oral)
1.For Orders see WP (C) No.1940/2011.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
MARCH 23, 2011 b'nesh
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue